Information about legal regulation.
A brief history of regulation
The legal world is one steeped in tradition, which is perhaps no surprise given that the earliest foundations of our current legal system were formed many hundreds of years ago! One aspect of this tradition which has been hard to shake is the heavy regulation, which for years meant that only traditional law firm partnerships could deliver legal services to the public.
Thankfully that changed in 2007 when a process of gradual deregulation was introduced, and further expanded recently in 2019. The law that brought about this change was the Legal Services Act. One of the major overhauls was the split of legal work into two distinct work types: reserved and non-reserved.
Reserved work covers just the following: appearing in court, conducting litigation, lodging certain property documents, conducting probate, administering oaths and notarial activities. Everything else is non-reserved - including general legal advice, alternative dispute resolution (before litigation), and drafting commercial documents e.g. contracts. Only regulated law firms and/or practising solicitors can do reserved work but the change in law means that unregulated businesses can undertake non-reserved work.
Choosing unregulated
It is understandable to be a little unsure at the mention of the term ‘unregulated’. However, these businesses are integral to the delivery of legal services in England and Wales. Very recently, the Legal Services Board estimated that the unregulated sector may account for up to 39% of the total market for small businesses, covering a variety of legal issues.
There are huge benefits to deregulation both generally and in the context of legal services; deregulation was necessary to increase competition, innovation, and consumer choice in the market. In the same study mentioned above, the Legal Services Board found that unregulated providers are often cheaper, more innovative, and more transparent with their prices than regulated competitors; while still offering a very good level of client service overall. It is easy to see why the unregulated model is attractive to both the legal service provider and its clients.
SLL’s business model
I made a clear and intentional decision to formulate SLL as an unregulated alternative legal service provider, (meaning the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) does not regulate the service that SLL delivers), for several good reasons:
Focused delivery. SLL delivers only non-reserved legal activities to clients, which supports a focused and streamlined business model; reserved areas are rarely applicable to SLL’s business clients looking for commercial advice / services. Regulation is no longer necessary for non-reserved work (as outlined above).
Reduced overheads / costs. The cost of complying with the regulatory regime can be very high and by removing certain overheads, I can offer much lower prices to clients.
More time for clients. The regulatory regime can be time-consuming and involve a lot of procedural hoop-jumping. This would hike up the overall cost of doing business and reduce the efficiency / speed of the service that SLL can deliver to clients.
Technology and Innovation. A regulated business has a number of restrictions which can inhibit innovation and the use of technology; an unregulated firm is not held back in the same way.
Quality of service
Whether a business is regulated or unregulated doesn’t necessarily have a bearing on the quality of service delivered to clients. After all, as in any market there are good and bad regulated businesses, and good and bad unregulated ones! It is reassuring of course that the Legal Services Board found that overall satisfaction levels are high and similar for regulated and unregulated providers.
Nonetheless, some concern over unregulated offerings employing inexperienced and/or unqualified consultants is reasonable and understandable. However, clients can rest assured that this is not the case with SLL - you will receive the highest standard of service because you will be getting a trusted legal advisor who:
studied, trained, and qualified as a practising solicitor;
worked for over a decade in various top 50 (regulated) law firms;
has significant experience of the legal commercial world;
has vast experience of the SRA regulatory regime and a full understanding of what constitutes great client care;
remains on the roll of solicitors (currently non-practising) where regulatory status can be monitored; and
is accountable to the SRA under the core SRA Principles.
Ultimately, being unregulated is a fantastic fit for SLL’s business model and it allows a degree of flexibility and innovation that is not available for regulated businesses. It really is an exciting time for the profession now that regulators are seeing the true benefits that this modern system has to offer.
Differences between regulated and unregulated legal service providers.
One of my fundamental principles is to be straightforward and transparent with clients. Following this approach, I believe that any client / potential client has a clear interest in understanding, and making informed choices about, their legal service provider. That includes any differences or limitations in the protections and redress options available to them. I set out below some of the key differences between regulated and unregulated firms; how SLL has addressed those issues; and how they may impact the service that SLL delivers.
1. SRA oversight/regulation
It perhaps goes without saying but the obvious difference between the two models is that unregulated businesses are not regulated by the SRA (or other regulator(s)) and do not have to comply with certain SRA rules in running their business.
SLL is not bound by the Code of Conduct for Firms and I am not bound personally by the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs (because I am currently a non-practising solicitor – see further below). Nonetheless, having worked at regulated firms for many years, I am fully aware of the standards set by the SRA and I strive to uphold those standards when delivering services to clients.
2. Insurance
Regulated law firms must obtain something called ‘SRA minimum terms insurance’ cover for professional indemnity (in case a mistake is made when providing the legal services). This cover is extensive and consequently very expensive. Details of the insurance can be found here.
There is no obligation for an unregulated business to take out this insurance; however for the protection of SLL and its clients, SLL has secured industry-standard professional indemnity cover with a reputable insurer which has an indemnity limit of £1,000,000 (1 million) per event. Copies of insurance documents and further details are available on request.
Whilst there may be some differences between these products, for the purposes of the work that SLL undertakes SLL does not anticipate there will be any material difference in the cover available to clients in the vast majority of cases.
3. SRA Compensation Fund
For unregulated services you will not be able to make a claim on the SRA Compensation Fund. This is in essence a discretionary fund made up of annual payments by everyone the SRA regulates. Payments from the Fund can be made where money has been stolen or not been accounted for by someone they regulate, or where a regulated person/firm did not have insurance in place to cover a claim.
It of course goes without saying that SLL will not steal your money! In any event, considering that SLL does not hold funds in escrow for clients in any transactional matters, this is not a pertinent risk to our clients. The only money transferred to SLL will be for fees and expenses payable by you.
The insurance position is addressed in more detail above.
4. Legal Ombudsman
For regulated service providers, if you are dissatisfied with their services and the firm has not satisfactorily resolved your complaint, you have the right to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman. If the Ombudsman decides to uphold a complaint it has the power to direct service providers to pay compensation when evidence shows it is required. It can also direct that work is re-done or completed, or that no action is needed.
For unregulated firms you are unable to refer the matter to the Legal Ombudsman. However, SLL has a robust complaints policy in place in the unlikely event that you are dissatisfied with your service. If your complaint can’t be resolved you are still able to refer the matter to any organisations that address complaints against unregulated service providers. Further, you still have the right to bring a legal claim and ask the court to determine the matter, should you wish.
5. Practising v non-practising solicitors
Although I qualified formally in 2014 and worked as a practising solicitor for many years following that, I am currently a non-practising solicitor.
This means I don’t currently hold a practising certificate. A practising certificate is issued to solicitors to allow them to (amongst other things) undertake reserved legal activities [I explain this in more detail on the Website’s ‘About’ page]. As SLL only undertakes non-reserved legal activities, a practising certificate is not required for the work I do.
For the avoidance of doubt there are no prohibitions on renewing my practising certificate if at any point I wished to - for example to go back into private practice. However, at that stage I would be subject to full SRA regulation once again. My SRA number is 507009 and you can review my complete practising status on the SRA’s website here.
Although I am not bound by the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs, I am bound by the SRA Principles at all times.